There are many books and studies that document the value of customer centricity and its relationship to profitability. Our favorites include the Go Giver by Bob Burg and John David Mann and Customer Intimacy by Fred Wiersama. Both talk about shaping your culture and your partnerships around the customer.
At Solutionz, we believe that one of the keys to unlocking a greater level of profitability in 2014 is to take a new view
of your organization and rather than taking a P&L view or a hierarchical view of the organization, you should model it around the customer.
Why the customer? Because that is where revenue comes from.
By doing this, you will find that you also become more centered on your various stakeholders, including your employees, your business partners and your shareholders. Everyone wins.
Draw a small circle and put
the word CUSTOMER in that circle. Then draw concentric circles around
that circle, like a target. Make them big enough to draw in.
By the way, this is another great exercise for a leadership meeting early in the year. You can draw this on a white board and adjust it until the leadership team reaches consensus. I recommend drawing the circles in black and then using different colored markers for the content. Or you can use small Post-It notes to put the content, so you can move it around to gain agreement from everyone.
dissecting the circle, so you can further segregate your costs. In the
upper left corner, should be everything having to do with servicing your
existing customers. Then on the upper right, put those functions
directly driving revenue from existing customers. In the lower left
should be new business development activities (industry conferences and
speaking engagements or other networking opportunities) and direct sales
activity to specific new prospects. If you want to get fancy, color
the right side of the grid green, as this is where revenue generation
The graphic above should be high enough
quality that you can download it and paste it into Word or Powerpoint.
Once you set up this target grid, I recommend printing multiple copies
of it, as it is good to look at multiple dimensions of your costs or to
measure at the beginning of each budgeting cycle. If you make the grid
big enough, you may be able to do all of these aspects on a single
Think about the various functions that directly touch your customer directly (for sales, service and business development, including distribution partner management)
and write those in the first circle. Then do the same thing for those
that service your front line (this would include supervisory and
management personal that manage the front line and also those that
handle billing, contract creation, etc.). In the third circle, put those that simply serve an administrative
function for the organization or those that the people in the second
circle have to go to for permission to say yes to a customer, policy or
Doing this functionally, rather than
departmentally can be useful, particularly for shared functions like IT,
where there may be a group that services your internal
network/computers and a development group that builds technology for
Include the headcount for each function. If you have split departmental lines, this make take a little effort from your CFO or your head of HR.
may be able to fit this on the master diagram, but you may want to
segregate it for privacy reasons, since there are many people that may
need to participate in this exercise. In many organizations, the
salary dollars are the highest on the third circle out from the
customer, so in extreme cases where headcount cuts are essential,
thinning out this layer is a good place to start.
Direct Cost Dimension
there are other monthly or annual costs that you need to capture, focus
on your top 3-5 costs in each quadrant of the grid and place them in
the appropriate circle on the target. Your operating expenses and
direct costs of sales should go here.
When you are all
done, make sure that you get input from the front line on the diagram
and make sure that they agree with the view you have portrayed.
Tomorrow we will talk more about profitability and how cost "tweaking" should be approached.
In reference to " Richard Anderson, Delta Air Lines (5Q Interview) " As a follow on to my earlier article last week about doing...
I am now going to shift gears away from online technology and the role that they play in the travel distribution ecosystem to a topic that I...
You fully understand that rung #1 of the ladder is spamming and you've gotten past rung #2, noise. You get it -- that in order to reall...
UPDATED - March 12, 2014 Well, in the world of travel distribution on the OTA side of the equation, if Travelocity was the "come...
Part 2 of a 2 Part Series on Individual Relationship Management (IRM) versus Customer Relationship Management (CRM) which is flawed B...
This week, Bloomberg announced that Sabre raised $627 million in its IPO. Actually I don't think you should be allowed to call ...
If you are familiar with the game of dominos, there are dots on each domino and the placement of a domino on each turn requires that you mat...
Wow, in as many weeks, I have said goodbye to two amazing men in the travel industry. Yesterday afternoon I learned of the untimely deat...
This is Part 2 in a 3 part series about airline distribution. Here we will talk about the web and direct distribution parts of the airli...